|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Comparison of Ventex 30 mA and Major Mfg LED

|
 |
 |
|
|
| Results: |
Average Light Intensity |
Power Usage |
| Ventex Powered Neon 30mA |
5357 Lux |
16 watts |
| Major Mfg Gen 1 LED |
2011 Lux |
34 watts |
| Major Mfg Gen 2 LED |
1658 Lux |
17 watts |
| |
|
|
 |
|
| Findings: |
The Ventex Neon 30 mA power supply when compared to a Major Mfg Gen 1 LED generated over two and a half times the light output at half the energy cost. The Ventex Neon 30 mA power supply when compared to a Major Mfg Gen 2 LED generated over three times the light output at similar energy costs. |
 |
|
|
| Reference Data : |
Average Light Intensity |
Power Usage |
| Traditional Electromagnetic 4030 |
5357 Lux |
35 watts |
| Ventex Powered Neon 60mA |
10814 Lux |
33 watts |
| |
|
|
 |
|
Test Protocol: |
This test compares the light output between the Ventex 4030-120 neon power supply, Major Mfg Gen 1 LED (CL4-HP) andMajor Mfg Gen 2 LED (with EGL C71 glass). All tests were conducted under the same conditions utilizing the same equipment and darkened room. The test box consisted of two adjoining 10" x 18" x 5" boxes overlaid with a single white plastic face. The neon box contained 3 strokes of 15 mm glass at 3 1/2" on center spacing. The LED box contained 8 Major Mfg Gen 1 LED or Major Mfg Gen 2 LED for a total of 16 individual LEDs configured in an approximate 3 1/2" grid pattern. Individual light measurements were taken at the face surface in a repeatable grid pattern. Reference standards were gathered under the same test conditions. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
© 2003
Ventex Technology, Inc. • 1440 West Indiantown Road Suite 350 • Jupiter, Florida 33458
Tel: 800-510-5400 • 561-840-8400 • Fax: 561-840-8401 • E-mail: info@ventextech.com |
|
| |
|
|